Subscribe for FREE: Learn About Coaching

Your email:

Follow Us

The Coaching Blog

If you're a professional Business or Life Coach or you're interested in becoming one, the SCM Coaching Blog covers topics you may want to know about: How to Become a Business or Life Coach, Grow a Successful Coaching Business, Get Coach Training and/or Business and Life Coach Certification, Become a Coaching Master and Evolve Your Life and Business. 

Subscribe above and/or explore by tag, month or article popularity, below.

Top Ten Best Coaching Blogs 2011 Winners

Browse by Tag

Top Career-Jobs Sites Living-Well blog

Coaching Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Why Coaching by Phone is Better Than Coaching in Person

 
Subscribe for free in the upper right corner ~

Business Coaching by PhoneI finally have an answer for you to the age-old question: Which is more effective, coaching by telephone or coaching in person?

The coaches who prefer coaching in person, invariably assume their way is better. Those of us who prefer to coach by telephone sheepishly counter that coaching by phone seems to work just as well.

But is telephone coaching really just as good as coaching face-to-face?

After all, we've all read the scientific estimates that up to 90% of the information we receive in a face-to-face conversation is visual, not verbal. So how can telephone coaching possibly work as well as face-to-face coaching?

And from another perspective, face-to-face coaches often brag that they make more money per hour, but do they really? Yes, telephone coaches charge their clients on average slightly less per contact hour, but they also spend less time in non-contact hours.

I'll explain: while I don't recommend scheduling your clients back-to-back (a 15 minute break helps you refocus), I've done it and I know lots of other phone coaches who do it and I can tell you that a few hours, earning $300/hour, from my home office on a snowy Monday sure beats traffic jams, commuter trains, crowded elevators and cafeteria lunches, ad nauseum, by a mile. And when you add up the extra time spent in transit, plus tolls, tickets, parking, gas, wardrobe, wear and tear on your car, eating out, not to mention all of the above which also has to be spent on in-person client attraction, versus attracting clients via the internet, I'm willing to bet telephone coaches make more per hour and enjoy more of their working hours with less stress.

But here's why telephone coaching is actually more effective than face-to-face coaching:

Remember how up to 90% of information taken in during a face-to-face conversation is visual? That should make face-to-face coaching 10 times more effective than telephone coaching, but it doesn't. Why? Because nearly all of that visual information is unconscious, meaning the coach isn't even aware of it.

It gets worse. Many assume that our brains absorb continuous information, like video cameras  making a movie, but they don't. Not even close. Your brain takes a couple of snapshots of visual information and fills in (nearly all) the rest with your expectations, assumptions, beliefs, shadows, biases and prejudices. In short, while you're talking to that person, you're taking in some new information from them, but you're unconsciously adding 80-90 times as much information from your past.

And you don't even know it.

With telephone coaching, if you're well-trained, you learn to consciously hear more. And if you practice those hearing skills in hundreds of coaching sessions, you develop the kind of hearing - at least for conversations - that usually only the blind possess, meaning you hear far more than most of us ever thought possible. And you do it without adding tons of info from your past.

Are telephone coaches completely free of their past assumptions? No of course not; no one is. But a strong case can be made that, because telephone coaching is a skill that's consciously learned from the ground up, the coach is aware of a larger percentage of incoming information, which helps them interface more fully with the present and the uniqueness of their client and the client's situation.

Here's an example: I've lost track over the years of the number of clients I've coached who were of a different race, socio-economic background, or sexual orientation, and I didn't know it. I'd like to think that wouldn't make any difference (unless it was pertinent to the topic of the coaching), but I've seen the studies on that and know how unlikely it is that anyone is completely free of biases.

Telephone coaching doesn't eliminate all assumptions and biases, but it narrows them down and makes it less likely that a bias or shadow can lurk undiscovered.

Here's another reason coaching by phone is more powerful: When using the telephone (or Skype), you can coach with anyone in the world. That means that out of over 7 billion people worldwide, you can match up with your ideal clients and be their perfect coach. Coaching in person is almost always constrained by distance and travel, forcing people to coach with whomever they can find in their home city.

You'd think with the ease and low cost of talking via online video, that video coaching would catch on quickly, but it hasn't so far. I'm guessing it's because video tends to highlight the visual in a way that makes it even harder to listen and really hear - and raises the likelihood that unconscious visual information is triggering a conditioned response. I find video coaching more distracting than anything.

Last but not least, from the client's perspective, lower prices for telephone coaching, plus higher quality coaching, means a greater ROI (return on investment) for clients. Who doesn't like that?

In short: phone coaching is not only just as good as in-person coaching, it's actually better. Do you agree?

-do-you-want-to-become-a-professional-c

Become a master coach and get the life and business you really want.

Comments

Julia, this is great! 
 
I also find that the old saying is quite true, if one sense is missing, the other senses sharpen. I find that not having a visual to distract me, my listen skills, (engaged listening) and intuition really sharpen.  
 
I have found the above that you mentioned to be quite true for me as well. 
 
The end result is that my clients come away with excellent value. 
 
Thanks for this blog. - Heidi Courtney :)  
 
Posted @ Wednesday, January 25, 2012 12:18 PM by Heidi Courtney
The 7th annual Sherpa Coaching survey, out today, takes on the phone vs. live topic. A free download atwww.sherpacoaching.com/survey.html . I'd love to read more comments here. 
Posted @ Wednesday, January 25, 2012 12:19 PM by Karl Corbett
I coach face-to-face when possible, by telephone when not. 
And I agree with Julia - I'm more focused when I work by telephone. 
My notes are better. I ask for written feedback - I get more of it from telephone engagements. 
 
The "focus" argument is central - I am clearer and more explicit when I work at it! 
 
Thanks for the discussion. 
Craig
Posted @ Wednesday, January 25, 2012 12:41 PM by Craig Jennings
Thanks Heidi, Karl and Craig for your comments. 
 
Craig - Interesting to see your comparison of telephone and in-person coaching. 
 
Karl - I've seen the Sherpa survey and it shows that some people prefer in-person coaching. I think that's based on a 'logical' assumption that it must be better. But the truth is often surprising.
Posted @ Wednesday, January 25, 2012 12:57 PM by Julia Stewart
Great information Julia it is just refreshing!
Posted @ Wednesday, January 25, 2012 1:01 PM by Lucette Kwidama
Thanks Lucette - I'm glad it's useful!
Posted @ Wednesday, January 25, 2012 1:32 PM by Julia Stewart
Good article! I enjoy having a variety of phone and in-person, but most of my clients are by phone. I believe I'm able to listen more intently and take better notes by phone, when I don't have to be concerned about making eye contact. For Skype, I won't use the camera. It's a pointless distraction without the advantages of in-person OR phone. Since my clients are ADD / ADHD, distraction is a big thing to avoid!
Posted @ Wednesday, January 25, 2012 5:00 PM by Bonnie Mincu
Thanks Bonnie! I'm a strong visual learner with a little ADD, so video is really distracting for me. And yes, note taking is easier when there's no eye contact. Which reminds me: Freudian analysts arranged to have no visuals, even though their clients were in all person ~ Hm...
Posted @ Wednesday, January 25, 2012 6:33 PM by Julia Stewart
You know, two years ago I would have disagreed, but it was just because I never tried it: it's a matter of training and coaching by phone is even more effective. Instead, for me, counseling by phone does not work at all, it seems there is a big difference between the two.
Posted @ Thursday, January 26, 2012 12:16 PM by David Papini
Yes, I'm not a counselor, but I understand there are many reasons why counseling in person is preferred. For instance, if the client is in crisis. But coaching clients are high functioners, which gives us more leeway. In any case, I'm glad you're finding that coaching by phone is more effective.
Posted @ Thursday, January 26, 2012 2:52 PM by Julia Stewart
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics